Case study · 04 / 05

BT Advice Wind-Down
One source of truth.

CompanyBT Financial Group
RoleData Product Owner
DomainData · Wealth
Year2019
Hero image · 1600 × 900 · swap in CMS

The problem.

BT's advice business sat across a decade of acquisitions, several platforms, and fragmented client data. The wind-down required a single accurate record per client, assembled across all of it.

The clock was external. A board-mandated deadline meant the timeline didn't move. Only the scope and the approach could.

The approach.

Run it like a product, not a data project. Customer first (the downstream teams who would use the data), then spec, then build.

  • Mapped every source system that held a piece of the client truth, and the gaps between them.
  • Designed reconciliation rules with the ops and compliance teams that would eventually rely on them.
  • Shipped iteratively, one client cohort working end-to-end, then scale, rather than waiting for the perfect schema.
  • Quality bar set by the strictest consumer (regulator reporting), not the most lenient.
“Data products don't have shiny front ends. They have a thousand quiet ways to be wrong.”

The outcome.

Single source of truth delivered on the board-mandated timeline.

400k+ clients with reconciled records, used as the basis for ongoing servicing and external reporting.

What I learned.

Boring products with board deadlines are some of the highest-stakes product work you can do. Treat them with the same discipline as anything customer-facing.

The people who eventually consume the data are the only useful spec reviewers. Design with them in the room, not for them at a distance.

Data ownership without product discipline becomes a backlog of one-offs. Run it as a product or it runs you.

Scale
400k+
clients reconciled
Sources
12+
data systems integrated
Deadline
Met
Board-mandated date
Sector
Wealth
APRA-regulated
Next case 05 · The category, covered. →